Debating The Feminist Breeder On Vaginal Breech Birth

Holding my 1 day old son, best birthday present ever!

Well, here we go again.  Gina of The Feminist Breeder has made her opinions very clear on breech vaginal birth.  As a woman who has never been put in that position I find it interesting that she has such strong thoughts on it and feels the need to tell other women how they should birth.  And of course having been banned for my last disagreement with her I am unable to respond to her directly, so you all get to hear the response of a woman who’s son was breech and chose (yes chose proudly) to have a c-section.

I have zero regrets about my choice.  I know it was right and I made the decision with all of the information and education I could get on the subject.  Despite what many natural birth advocates would have people believe.  If you sign up for a c-section that does not mean you are uneducated.  It does not mean you love your child less because of it.  It doesn’t make you a bad mom and it doesn’t make you any less of a mother either.  The fact is breech happens in 2-3% of women.  That’s it.  It’s not a variation of normal, not with that small percentage.  So I just want to start out saying to The Feminist Breeder, when you have been faced with the terrifying thought of a breech birth then and only then can you have a say in this.  Until then, keep your misinformation to yourself.

My Story Is Five Years Old

Five years ago today I was trying to keep my mind off of the planned c-section.  The knowledge that in less than 24 hours I was finally going to have a son, but to get him it meant major abdominal surgery.  It had been a month to six weeks leading up to this final decision.  When around 32 weeks my doctor noticed that he hadn’t turned yet she began discussing things with me.  Assuring me there was still time.  Every week I went in and every week he hadn’t moved at all.  Finally at 34 weeks we seriously began discussing my options.  I had two.  We could turn him at 36 weeks and hope for the best but expect the worst or we could go ahead and schedule the c-section.

So I began doing some research.  Talking to people about different ways I could get him to turn on my own.  Trying exercises.  Music played on my lower stomach.  A bag of cold peas on the top of my belly.  Anything to just get him to move on his own.  The version meant two doctors pushing on the outside of my stomach with lots of pain and the possibility that we could end up with a c-section anyways, only an emergency c-section.  If all went well I would have walked out of there and we wouldn’t have to be back until he decided it was time for his grand entrance.  A planned c-section meant things were controlled, we could make sure he was born closer to his due date and we could plan my husband’s vacation so he could be there to take care of the kids and help me recoup while I was in the hospital.

But hey, women have delivered babies vaginally breech before.  I know I’ve heard about it.  My mom has often told me that I was breech right up until she delivered me and that she had to tell the doctor to leave me be I would turn.  And I did.  I discussed things with my doctor.  I talked to nurses at the hospital.   Delivering him breech vaginal was not a safe option.  The doctors weren’t trained in it, the hospital wouldn’t allow it, and this is where The Feminist Breeder has issue because women don’t have a choice.  But this is where my story becomes important for that.  Because if I had that as a choice and I chose it, I might have a very different story to be telling you today.

Let Us Say Vaginal Birth Was An Option

Suppose for a minute that at 35 weeks or so I could have found another doctor to take me and deliver me vaginally.  Suppose that any doctor would take another doctor’s patient that late in the pregnancy who has Gestational Diabetes (controlled with diet) and who has chronic high blood pressure (controlled relatively well with medication).  Suppose we lived in a parallel universe where all of this stuff was allowed.  Suppose that I wouldn’t also need loads and loads of cash to be able to do this because insurance is not going to pay for this.  Face it people, this is truly not a viable option for most people unless you are Kimberly Van Der Beek with unlimited resources like a world renowned doctor, as The Feminist Breeder likes to call him, Dr. Fischbein.  Let us not mince words, my blue collar butt will not be getting any world renowned physicians who are willing to take me with no ability to pay.  But let us say all of the stars alined and this was a possibility.

Had I even attempted to deliver my son vaginally, well lets just say I try not to think about it too much.  As soon as my doctor got in there she said it’s a good thing we didn’t try to turn him, he has the cord wrapped around his neck twice.  Now, I know what you’re going to say, the cord around the neck is a very common and babies can be delivered vaginally with that.  Okay, sure when they are coming down head first.  How long do you think a baby can sustain the pressure of a cord wrapped around his neck going through the birth canal?   What is the first thing the doctor does when a baby comes out head first with the cord around his neck?  He takes the cord off from around his neck.  So a baby who comes out feet first is left with that noose around the neck.

Even without that, even though I had two almost nine pound babies before my son with a proven pelvis the risk and complication with a breech birth was more than I was willing to take.  And honestly, I have to say a woman who chooses to do that and do it at home it scares me.  If I were going to deliver my son vaginally, then it would have to be in the most controlled situation with constant monitoring.  Not in a home setting.

I think that’s what people don’t understand about why people get angry when they hear about a woman who talks about this like it’s no big deal.  It is a very big deal and it’s life and death.  If I couldn’t be monitored, then how would the doctors pick up on an issue like the cord wrapping tighter and tighter around my son’s neck?  These are very real and very scary scenarios.  What if the baby doesn’t come down right?  What if he gets stuck and all of the techniques learned do nothing for him?

So you see, I have thought about this a lot.  I did enough to educate myself on my options.  I chose to put my life in greater risk so my son could be here.  Yes, even with two other children at home.

To The Feminist Breeder, doctors don’t do it here in the US because it is not a safe option.  Because it cannot be taught in a classroom.  Because it doesn’t happen enough that a doctor in residency would get enough training in it.  Because of the 2-3% of women who present as breech when told of the risks to their baby in a breech vaginal delivery and the risks to their baby in a c-section a large percentage of those women would choose c-section.  I was faced with that choice 5 years ago and I don’t for one minute doubt that I made the absolute right choice for me and my son.

Just like I’m sure Kimberly Van Der Beek is sure she made the right choice for her child.  But what a famous person with unlimited resources manages to do and what a typical woman without a lot of resources can do are two different things.  Lets not make women feel like they are less of a woman because they weren’t able to have a vaginal breech birth.  And certainly lets not put a woman on a pedestal who had more resources at her disposal than most women in the US ever will have.

And lastly, why is it that Dr. Fischbein is only doing homebirths or birth center births now?  Why is he not practicing in a large hospital with all of his helpful expertise?  Is it because of his conviction of sexual exploitation of a patient?  Not lies or rumors here Gina, it’s public record.  His license is revoked, but the revocation is stayed following a 7 year probation.  He has no choice but to do homebirths if he wants to continue to attend births because no hospital is going to take that risk.  This is the world renowned saint of a doctor who gives women birth choices.  He also takes advantage of women who are in weakened conditions.  I’m hard pressed to believe that anything he has to say is not him taking advantage of a situation.  His heroing acts of being the only homebirth doctor who also delivers breech babies in the US come off simply as a man who has a God complex.

I strongly believe in mother’s intuition, but it needs to also take into account reliable sources.  Not a quack, not the words of  someone who is uneducated on the subject and has never been faced with that choice, and not by the untrained.  Getting a 2nd opinion is one thing, but going and going and going until you get what you want to hear from someone is something else entirely.

And that ladies and gentleman is the real truth behind vaginal breech birth with Dr. Fischbein.  So who’s ready to jump in and have a vaginal breech birth when faced with these real life consequences?

Related posts:

Comments

  1. Thank you for calling out the Feminist Breeder. I personally don’t think she should be allowed to call herself a feminist, while ignoring the criminal behavior of her “angel of a doctor”. Thank you for telling your story and thank you most of all for mentioning the deeds about this conviction and linking to them. I love your blog!

    • Thank you Naima, I think there’s a lot of things The Feminist Breeder should not be calling herself. She’s only interested in a woman’s point of view if it jives with her own, not for all women, for all women like her. She is not an educator. She has people pointing out her faulty reasoning left and right. And what does she do instead of listening and learning? She blocks and bans. Someone who is interested in educating needs to have an open mind. That is not her. I wish people could go there and share information like this without fear of being called a troll and being banned, but she’s not interested in letting people give more information than she’s capable of. She has to be the best and brightest and anyone who makes her look otherwise is a troll. That is a shame. She and whoever else over there on her page are more than welcome to come here and tell me I’m wrong about anything I had to say here.

  2. Well I’m even “worse” in TFB’s book, because I had an ELCS and it wasn’t even for a breech baby. My reasons are my own, and it was the best birth I could’ve had.

    Sadly it seems that TFB is more about disempowering women she disagrees with, than she is about empowering all women to make the choices which are best for them. Which, as Naima said, means that she isn’t a feminist at all. She’s a bigot. What’s sad is the audience she has who agree with her… but then, that is their choice. I respect that. I wish they didn’t feel the need to continually ram their opinions down everyone’s throat as “facts”, but if wishes were horses…

    A friend linked this blog on FB – I’ve never read your stuff before, but I really like this post. I’m about to get a coffee and delve into your archive :)

    • She’s all about a women’s right to choose until she chooses what she thinks is the wrong choice, right? Sad isn’t it? I don’t know why she has to assume that simply because a woman has a c-section it’s because she wasn’t educated in that decision. Because she had one and didn’t like it? So it wasn’t for her. That doesn’t mean that all women who have a c-section are the victim she feels she was. Some of us believe whole heartily that our c-sections were life saving events and just because she can’t understand that thinking doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Hind sight it 20/20 though and since she has swayed on many different beliefs in her lifetime there is a distinct possibility that she might just sway on something like this too.

      My issue with some of the people who follow her though is that I worry that they are going to take her advice as gospel and run with it. I worry about the “teachings” she gives out as complete fact. I worry about her not allowing differing points of view on her page and a person reading her words and thinking she knows her stuff when she doesn’t. I worry that another woman is going to find Dr. Fischbein and go to him thinking he’s this great and professional doctor and she’s going to become his next victim because TFB dismissed people’s warnings about him. Dr. Fischbein’s license is revoked, but he’s the best doctor in the world. Dr. Tuteur allows her license to lapse to raise her family and she’s a quack who doesn’t know what she’s talking about. Isn’t it funny how that works?

  3. I just want to clarify your comment about the external cephalic version (ECV). I am 40+ weeks pregnant. 4 weeks ago, I found out my baby was breech and 2 weeks later, I had an ECV. She was successfully and safely turned during this procedure. I found the procedure uncomfortable but not terribly painful and it only took about 1 minute to turn my daughter. I received a nonstress test before and after the procedure to monitor her status and she was completely stable the whole time. Only one physician performed the procedure, not two.

    Had my daughter remained or turned breech again, I would absolutely have opted for an elective c-section. But ECV is a safe procedure that has way more evidence behind it than other techniques for turning breech babies (I tried them all–acupuncture, moxibustion, hypnosis, etc.). ACOG recommends that all women with a breech presentation be offered ECV as an option. Of course, there is a risk of fetal distress with ECV but it is an INCREDIBLY small risk. I am an RN and researched this extensively and know I made the best choice. I do not judge your choice for having the c-section and perhaps your baby would have suffered distress during the ECV. But I think you made this procedure sound much scarier than the evidence and my experience suggests and I don’t want other people coming across this post thinking ECV is not an option for breech presentation. Here is a Cochrane review about the procedure: http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD000083/external-cephalic-version-for-breech-presentation-at-term

    • Thank you Joselle. My doctor was going to have a 2nd doctor there to assist her. That’s why I said there would be two doctors. And my baby absolutely would have gone into distress. There are no questions about it. That was the very first thing my doctor said to me when she got in there was it’s a good thing we didn’t do the version. I chose elective c-section over possible emergency c-section for many reasons. It wasn’t a risk I wanted to take, I wanted to have more control over the situation. I’m not saying women shouldn’t try turning. My doctor really wanted to go that route. But she was glad I didn’t choose it when all was said and done. I am saying though that delivering a baby breech vaginally has a hell of a lot of risks to the baby. And when something goes wrong there’s not much one can do to fix it. I’m glad your ECV worked out and it wasn’t a difficult procedure. I’m sorry if you feel I painted it in a negative light. I did my research too and came to a different conclusion than you. Such is life. Best of luck on the delivery of your little one. I am aware that ECV is the recommended course of action, which is why that was given to me as an option. In my case elective c-section was undoubtedly the best course of action though.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] all know that my son was breech and born via c-section right? Well, if not he was. I made that decision after a lot of research and a lot of discussing my [...]

Speak Your Mind

*